UFO-Forschung - Journalistische Wortspielereien um UFO-Beobachtungen von Astronauten



Privat schmeckt aufgewärmter kalter Kaffe nicht und genau so ist es beim Aufwärmen von alten Ufologen-Deutungen über UFO-Beobachtungen, welche die Redaktionen von Mysterie-Serien wie in Bild aufgreifen. Hier wünschte man sich im Jahre 2018 ein kritischeren Umgang  mit solchen Meldungen und nicht wie in den tiefen 70iger Jahren, als die Schlagzeile dicker war als der eigentliche Bericht. 

Es wird ja nicht bezweifelt es solche UFO-Beobachtungen von Astronauten gab, wie so viele Beobachtungen von Piloten, nur kann man diese genau so auf schlüssigen Stimulus zurück führen wie bei Privat-Personen. 

Wenn dann die Redaktion sich noch zu Anmerkungen mit Alien-Schlagzeilen wie heute in der Bild hinreisen lässt, stellt sich die Frage nach journalistischer Sorgfaltspflicht in der Zeit der Fake-News über welchen man sich zwei Räume weiter in der Redaktion aufregt.

Hier das Beispiel von Heute in Bild:




Jeder Zeuge eines Geschehens wird "voll davon überzeugt" sein, nur stellt dies in keinem Fall ein Beweis für Aliens dar. 

Wie man es besser macht bei solchen Meldungen ist in unserem Nachbarland Österreich bei zu sehen:





Die Aussage von Aldrin im Interview das er die Existenz von Aliens nicht ausschließt, deckt sich auch mit der UFO-Politik von CENAP, nur differenziert er genau so wie CENAP davon die UFO-Beobachtungen. Da es bisher kein Beweis für Alien-Besuch oder gar für deren Präsenz auf der Erde gibt und die UFO-Beobachtungen schlüssigen Stimulus zugeordnet werden können.



Update: 10.04.2018


The Story Claiming Buzz Aldrin Saw Aliens in Space Is Utter Nonsense

A viral story that's making the rounds online claims Buzz Aldrin, the famous astronaut who traveled with Neil Armstrong to the moon aboard Apollo 11, somehow proved via a lie-detector test to have seen a UFO in outer space. Let's be very clear here: This is flat-out wrong.

Here's why.

First, the news reports misrepresent what Aldrin actually said. In a Reddit comment three years ago, Aldrin said that, while he did see something shiny out the window in space, he believes it was the sun reflecting off one of four discarded panels from his own spacecraft.

Second, it's part of a report, published in the Daily Star Sunday (April 8), that says astronauts "Aldrin, Al Worden, Edgar Mitchell and Gordon Cooper all took part in the study."

This is impossible.

The "study" in this case refers to some ill-defined lie-detector test designed to prove that these men had seen UFOs and were "completely convinced" that signs of alien life were genuine, undertaken under "laboratory conditions."

This is nonsense for several reasons, but the most salient of them, as The Independent pointed out, is that both Mitchell and Cooper are dead. Cooper has been dead for nearly 14 years. They absolutely did not "take part" in any recent study.

What actually happened is that a company called The Institute of BioAcoustic Biology released some Microsoft Word documents claiming to distinguish some deeper truth from pre-existing audio recordings of the astronauts. The documents, which the company later sent to Live Science, claim to be the results of computer analysis, but that's somewhat doubtful. Here's a sample from the "vocal profile" of Aldrin:

"Aldrin believes what he is saying emotionally but has doubts intellectually. His ego, on a highly spiritual level, is solidly involved. He has a firm belief in what he saw but logical awareness that he cannot explain what he saw; therefore he thinks he should be doubted. His gut level emotions and system of integrity is well grounded with the exception that he has some issues around people asking too much of him and expecting him to take care of things for them. For the benefit of the people, he wants his statements about his seeing a UFO to be believed."

Again, not only does this directly contradict what Aldrin has actually said on the matter, but it doesn't remotely resemble a computer analysis of any kind.

And this is where the third problem with the Star's report comes in: It's scientifically indefensible.

Even true lie-detector tests simply do not have scientific validity. The National Research Council's sweeping 2003 report on the matter states, "Almost a century of research in scientific psychology and physiology provides little basis for the expectation that a polygraph test could have extremely high accuracy."

(There have been more recent, Department of Homeland Security-funded efforts to develop tools for lie detection and predicting intent from videos, but so far they haven't panned out.)

And the "test" performed in the viral story appears not to have been a true lie-detector test at all. Instead, it appears to be some sort of effort to discern truthfulness and intent from audio of the astronauts speaking, performed by a company with a website mostly devoted to selling "cures" for various health problems and making claims about various famous figures in the news. (When Live Science emailed the company requesting the astronaut documents, the response included documents on other famous figures, including one predicting that Harvey Weinstein will "fake suicide and disappear.")

There's just no reason to believe this company has the ability to discern truth from recordings of people's voices. While bioacoustics is a real area of scientific inquiry, it simply doesn't answer questions like "Is this person lying?" Instead, it answers questions about what sounds animals make, how they make them and when they make them.

The Institute of BioAcoustic Biology appears to be a for-profit company selling pseudoscientific cures for various health issues, with testimonials from people claiming physical ailments have been lifted after listening to custom sets of tones. The company has never published in Bioacoustics, the only international and peer-reviewed journal on the subject, and sources none of its scientific claims in actual science publications.

Here's an excerpt from the company's mission statement:

"As a bridge between ancient ideas of sound healing and the futuristic, Star Trek, protocols that the institute provides, it is now possible to reverse diseases and traumas previously thought to be incurable, to reveal the secrets of our true nature, to enhance our lives, to predict what may be our fate through the frequencies of our voice."

A reasonable person might conclude that the Aldrin claims, seeming to stem from the Daily Star report, are an effort to garner media attention for the company.

In fact, Live Science worried that even debunking the company's claims would throw fuel on the pseudoscience fire. But we decided to write this article because there is, in the end, value in clarifying the science, or lack thereof.

Aldrin has been very clear about what he believes he saw in outer space, and Live Science sees no reason to doubt him.

Quelle: SC



Raumfahrt+Astronomie-Blog von CENAP 0